Verdicts and recommendations
How to read verdicts in the Analysis column
For every domain, the service issues a final verdict — an overall assessment based on the domain's metrics, its history, anchors, and spam checks. In the results table the verdict is shown as an icon in the "Analysis" column: hover over it and the tooltip starts with the line "Verdict: …".
| Verdict | What it means |
|---|---|
| Clean | No signs of spam found; by its history and profile the domain looks like a normal website. |
| Weak | No spam, but the domain has little value: weak metrics, a thin history. |
| Suspicious | There are some warning signs — worth a manual review before buying. |
| Spam | Clear traces of spam found: spam keywords, PBN signals, a doorway-page history. |
Recommendation
The Analysis column does not show the recommendation — it holds only the verdict, the score and the signal icons. The recommendation is visible in the domain card: the top verdict card has a "Recommendation" line. The Excel export also has a separate "Recommendation" column.
- Buy — the domain looks like a quality asset.
- Check — the questionable points need a manual check.
- Skip — the domain is not worth taking.
In the Excel file the same three values are written as "Buy", "Check" and "Skip".
The full text explanation of the analysis is shown in the Analysis cell tooltip and in the top verdict card of the domain card — the one headed by the status ("The domain is clean", "Spam detected", "Needs a manual check"). The "Detailed analysis" block does not repeat this explanation: it shows the score for each check as N/10 with a status icon and a short conclusion — Link profile, Anchor profile, Backlink quality, Keywords, Spam in content, PBN signals, Domain history, Topic consistency, robots.txt and sitemap, Internal links, Spam in URLs, Redirect analysis. The set of cards depends on the data collected: whatever was not collected does not appear in the block. Below in the same block are "Strengths", "Weaknesses", "Risks" and "Spam details".